Sorin Group Announces FDA Approval and First US Implant of the World's Smallest Implantable Dual Chamber Pacemaker
02 September 2008
The Sorin Group, the largest European cardiovascular company and world leader in medical technologies for cardiac surgery, announced today the U.S. food and drug administration’s (FDA) approval to market the REPLY™ family of dual and single chamber pacemakers.
The REPLY pacemaker, the world’s smallest dual chamber pacemaker at 8cc’s, is Sorin Group’s next pacing evolution designed to reduce ventricular pacing and promote cardiac function.
REPLY integrates Sorin Group’s new proprietary SafeR™ pacing mode. The SafeR technology builds on the Sorin Group’s proven AAISafeR™ first introduced in Europe in September 2003 and in the US in May 2005. AAISafeR switches from AAI to DDD in case of AV block detention, and has been shown to reduce unnecessary pacing in both Sinus Node Disease and unselected AV Block patients. Delivering unnecessary pacing to the right ventricle has been shown to significantly enhance the risk of patients developing heart failure and atrial fibrillation.
In addition to SafeR, the REPLY pacemaker delivers advanced, automatic features such as SmartCheck™, which lets the user automate follow up tests and provides comprehensive data reporting and recommendations.
The REPLY pacemaker delivers to the market Sorin Group’s 2nd generation universal pacing platform built around our exclusive SafeR pacing mode. REPLY and SafeR demonstrate Sorin Group’s continued commitment to driving innovation in cardiac rhythm management and reinforces our mission t continuously improve the treatment of Bradycardia”, said Fred Hrkac, President of Sorin Group cardiac rhythm management business.
Dr Randy Lieberman, director of Electrophysiology at Harper University Hospital and Assistant Professor of medicine at Wayne State University school of medicine in Detroit implanted the first REPLY pacemaker in the U.S. “The updated 2008 ACC/AHA guidelines for device based therapy highlight the new standard of care in pacing which is to minimize unnecessary ventricular pacing. The REPLY pacemaker was the right choice for this patient. Pacemaker options that only offer AV delay or AV search hysteresis do not eliminate frequent ventricular pacing for a significant number of patients. It’s important to know that down-sized devices do not mean that physicians have to compromise. Reply provides the output, longevity and pacing algorithms that physicians are looking for.
